[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: [wg-c] new TLDs

To: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Subject: Re[2]: [wg-c] new TLDs
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 22:04:19 -0800
CC: "'Andrew Lutts'" <andy@netatlantic.com>, wg-c@dnso.org
In-reply-To: <47FE39302BF73B4C93BC84B87341282C1EEB@condor.lvrmr.mhsc.com>
Organization: WXWeb Services
References: <47FE39302BF73B4C93BC84B87341282C1EEB@condor.lvrmr.mhsc.com>
Reply-To: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

Hello Roeland,

Friday, November 17, 2000, 9:22:46 PM, you wrote:

> Not at all. WRT WEB, the BoD is excersizing duck-and-cover. Of three
> possible scenarios, that is the one that hurts them the least. They deferred
> it to the new BoD.

Don't read so much into it.  It was only because no board member
objected to .info and 2 objected to .web that Afilias didn't get .web
instead.  It wouldn't have happened if it wasn't for Cerf.

The rest of the board had voted 6-2 to approve .web for Afilias.
Only because it was 8-0 for .info did that one advance instead.

There is no duck and cover, except by Vint Cerf.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com

References:
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs
  - From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs
  - From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] new TLDs
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] new TLDs
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-c] new TLDs
Next by thread: [wg-c] The People's Choice of TLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread