[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT

To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
From: bill@mail.nic.nu (J. William Semich)
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 09:43:33 -0400
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org


PROPOSED ROUGH CONSENSUS ITEM NUMBER ONE	
>
>	The initial rollout should include a range of top level domains, from open
>TLDs to restricted TLDs with more limited scope.

Yes - half could be restricted/chartered, half unrestricted/open

>
>PROPOSED ROUGH CONSENSUS ITEM NUMBER TWO

NO

>
>PROPOSED ROUGH CONSENSUS ITEM NUMBER THREE
>

NO - this is a matter for the private sector (www.minc.org) and the IETF to
work out.

--Bill Semich
.NU Domain
http://whats.nu

Follow-Ups:
- MINC (Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT)
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] Administrivia (041700)
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Next by thread: MINC (Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread