[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT

To: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
From: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 09:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
cc: wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20000411112918.02f92368@msen.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org


Jon,

thanks for the effort! my votes are below.

best regards,

-rick

On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
> 
> PROPOSED ROUGH CONSENSUS ITEM NUMBER ONE	
> 
> 	The initial rollout should include a range of top level domains,
> from open TLDs to restricted TLDs with more limited scope.

NO: initial should only contain generic, not chartered.

> 
> 
> PROPOSED ROUGH CONSENSUS ITEM NUMBER TWO

NO: nice but with out directions on how to implement the principials they
are useless.

> 
> PROPOSED ROUGH CONSENSUS ITEM NUMBER THREE
> 

NO: let the IETF do its work, once a technical solution exists we can
    work on developing policy.

References:
- [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] Administrivia (041500)
Next by Date: [wg-c] TUCOWS.com Comments on IPC Sunrise Proposal
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread