[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] "It Won't Work"

To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-c] "It Won't Work"
From: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:15:40 -0700
In-Reply-To: <4.3.0.20000411205904.00bef620@mail.bayarea.net>
References: <3.0.3.32.20000411171843.02fcf540@msen.com><4.3.0.20000411110806.00b76d60@mail.bayarea.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At 09:07 PM 4/11/00 -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:

>It certainly means that there are no expectations that anyone can apply 
>the list objectively or reliably when making choices.

In other words - the list is completely useless. It's one big guess. 
Someone else is making the decisions.

Best Regards,

Simon

--
The future is still out there...

References:
- Re: [wg-c] "It Won't Work"
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
- [wg-c] "It Won't Work"
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] "It Won't Work"
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Please Explain "No on 1, Yes on 2" (More)
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] "It Won't Work"
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] "It Won't Work"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread