Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

At least your honest about it.

--
Christopher Ambler
chris@the.web
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> On 11-Apr-2000 Christopher Ambler wrote:
> > You are proposing a WG on a *policy* matter.
> 
> Not unlike everything else this and every other workgroup has done.
>  
> > ICANN's very own mandate says that they oversee TECHNICAL
> > COORDINATION of the Internet.
> > 
> > How do you justify this?
> 
> That this mandate is nothing more than an illusion.
> 
> - --
> William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> http://userfriendly.com/
> GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
> Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/
> 
> iD8DBQE485jP8zLmV94Pz+IRAlbwAKCxANSEJ2ySRMfMsc7TIfQG2C5QaQCfSTmA
> /RgxU14qK5cbfAbQd3n86m4=
> =tU88
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----