[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Important -- voting on WG report



Jon,

I vote "YES".

I wish the reference to Position Paper E (Pubic comments, .NAA) was explicit
that the "principles discussed above" referred to those contained in the
section "Arguments supporting the consensus position", rather than simply
next after "Arguments opposing the consensus position", but a) I should have
caught it earlier, and b) the readers, NC and ICANN Board, US DoC, etc., are
capable of drawing the correct conclusions.

Eric