[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] terms of Registry license

To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] terms of Registry license
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 10:38:56 -0800
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003180824300.17095-100000@loki.ar.com>
Reply-To: <cambler@iodesign.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

>how do folks see the new registries being licensed the ability to allocate
>SLDs in a new TLD. What should the Term be? How long should a registry
>have a license to run a gTLD be? 5 years? 

How long does NSI have? Anything else is unfair competition at this
point.

>What oversight should be in place to ensure that non-shaired gTLDs don't
>abuse their position. 

What oversight is in place for NSI? Anything else is unfair competition
at this point.

--
Christopher Ambler
chris@the.web

References:
- [wg-c] terms of Registry license
  - From: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Progress
Next by Date: RE: [wg-c] "within the process"
Prev by thread: [wg-c] terms of Registry license
Next by thread: [wg-c] whois - opperational issues && new gTLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread