[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report

To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
From: david@aminal.com
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 20:23:40 -0600
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20000310164025.02fb7534@msen.com>; from weinberg@mail.msen.com on Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 04:40:25PM -0500
Mail-Followup-To: wg-c@dnso.org
References: <3.0.3.32.20000310164025.02fb7534@msen.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org



> "Registries would apply describing
> their proposed TLD, and an ICANN body or process would make selections
> taking into account the characteristics of both the registry and its
> proposed TLD."

FWIW, this statement has my support.

David Schutt
Speco, Inc

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
  - From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@stealthgeeks.net>

References:
- [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
- [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread