Re: [wg-c] non-consensus call

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 08:39:52AM -0500, Kevin J. Connolly wrote:
> There is a different paradigm for "chartered" TLDs, one which 
> carries strong implications about the content of the domains 
> delegated under them without imposing prior restraints.  
> Under this paradigm, anyone can register anything under a 
> chartered TLD, but abusive registrations are subject to cancellation 
> at the behest of any interested party.

Yes, precisely as the UDRP is supposed to work.  No cost to 
registries/registrars. 

[...]

> Second, and most importantly, now that Kathy has made clear that 
> the eight principles are entirely optional, and are intended for adoption 
> or rejection by registries as they see fit, I believe that further discussion 
> of or based upon the Eight Principles should come to a screeching halt 
> in this WG.  Since the election to use the principles or not is reserved to 
> each registry, I believe it is beyond our bailiwick.

You are kind.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain