[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] Specific Implementation Proposal: [Was:Re: nineprinciplesfordomain names]

To: "Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] Specific Implementation Proposal: [Was:Re: nineprinciplesfordomain names]
From: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:53:49 -0800 (PST)
cc: wg-c@dnso.org, rmeyer@mhsc.com
In-Reply-To: <s8b3badc.084@gw1.rspab.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org


Kevin,

On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Kevin J. Connolly wrote:

> I know because (1)  even tho' the CORE SRS is "open source," 

CORE's software is NOT opensource and to date they have not made a public
release of their client or their message format. NSI has made the RRP
protocol version 1.1.0 public as an Informational RFC now available as an
Internet Draft at
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hollenbeck-rrp-01.txt

there is *no* need to sign an NDA to read the draft!

-rick

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [wg-c] Specific Implementation Proposal: [Was:Re: nineprinciplesfordomain names]
  - From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>

References:
- RE: [wg-c] Specific Implementation Proposal: [Was:Re:nineprinciplesfor domain names]
  - From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names
Next by Date: RE: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-c] Specific Implementation Proposal: [Was:Re:nineprinciplesfor domain names]
Next by thread: RE: [wg-c] Specific Implementation Proposal: [Was:Re: nineprinciplesfordomain names]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread