[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] Comments
Neither, I think. It was a summary of the characteristics of the comment
set that are most obvious upon a quick glance: (1) a majority of them
support PPE; (2) most of those messages are extremely brief -- often
containing only a subject line, with the text portion blank.
At 01:56 PM 1/12/00 +0100, Mark Measday wrote:
>Could you clarify whether this is an allegation of the equivalent of
>or merely a note that the visionary qualities of Eric's paper struck an
>demotic chord? I think Mr Brunner is owed that clarification.
>Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
>> The comment period on the WG-C interim report is closed, with
>> filed. About 200 of them appear to be in the format "I support Position
>> Paper E" (Eric Brunner's paper urging the creation of .naa). I'll post an
>> informal comment summary to the list as soon as I finish writing it.