[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [wg-c] new TLDs
I gave you counterexamples, which you ignored.
An upcoming example is .EU
An existing example is .INT
Ad Hominems are, as always, free.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Saturday, December 25, 1999 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [wg-c] new TLDs
At 02:17 PM 12/25/1999 , Christopher Ambler wrote:
>Dave issues a challenge and then changes the rules to suit his
>Why am I not surprised?
Thanks for the ad hominem, but the question was always and only about the
IANA/ICANN DNS. What you are calling 'changing the rules' is instead an
attempt to keep focus on things that are relevant and exclude those that
One of the many sources of distraction for this group has been the constant
effort to bring in discussion of things outside the purview if
ICANN. ICANN's responsibility pertains to a particular DNS root. All
others are independent.
My assertion was that letting a registry create the TLD has no precedent
within the IANA/ICANN DNS.
Counter-examples continue to be solicited.
Dave Crocker <email@example.com>
Brandenburg Consulting <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253, Fax: +1.408.273.6464
675 Spruce Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA