[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL

To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL
From: "Michael D. Palage" <mpalage@ipwarehouse.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 05:33:48 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19991208163540.03052adc@msen.com>
Reply-To: <mpalage@infonetworks.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

NO

Reason: Until the safeguards that are being contemplated in Working Group B
are demonstrated to work properly, I do not believe that it would be prudent
to start with more than one commercial gTLD as part of a testbed phase.

Michael D. Palage
Co-Chair Working Group B

References:
- [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL
Next by Date: AW: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread