RE: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs

[Ivan Pope <ivan@netnames.com>]

> >
> >Yes, these do appear to be foundational questions.
> 
> I also agree.  Notwithstanding Javier's suggestion that is 
> thread belongs in WG-C-3,
> I think it's impossible for us to make our recommendations in 
> a vacuum.
> 

Sense! I have no idea why there are three non-connected bunches of people
all (maybe) discussing parts of the whole. 
Also, I've been subscribed to wg-c-2 and wg-c-3 since Monday and have seen
no traffic at all.
Is there an archive?
Ivan