[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] RE: opportunity to pre-empt, or license to infringe?

To: "Hartman, Steve" <HartmanS@Nabisco.com>, "Ellen Rony" <erony@marin.k12.ca.us>
Subject: Re: [wg-b] RE: opportunity to pre-empt, or license to infringe?
From: "John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <john@johnberryhill.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 00:15:30 -0400
Cc: "'Judith Oppenheimer'" <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>, <wg-b@dnso.org>
References: <v04020a03b525352675e4@[204.188.254.44]>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

> A sunrise provision for trademarks plus 20 variations turns the trademark
> owners into cybersquatters.

No, Mr. Hartman said it was "reasonable".

19 or 21 would be unreasonable, presumably.

References:
- Re: [wg-b] RE: opportunity to pre-empt, or license to infringe?
  - From: Ellen Rony <erony@marin.k12.ca.us>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-b] RE: opportunity to pre-empt, or license to infringe?
Next by Date: RE: [wg-b] RE: opportunity to pre-empt, or license to infringe?
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-b] RE: opportunity to pre-empt, or license to infringe?
Next by thread: [wg-b] opportunity to pre-empt, or license to infringe?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread