RE: [wg-b] WG-B Report

["Judith Oppenheimer" <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>]

What is the purpose of posting the report for public comment if it is to be
amended?

Will a disclaimer appear with the report stating that the sunrise proposal
had not been discussed *at all* by WG-B prior to its inclusion in the
report?

Will the attachments be included, and will they be properly rearranged to
appear in order of date submitted?

Judith Oppenheimer

800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Consulting – FREE Daily HeadsUp Headlines.
"...superb real-time source..." –– "...invaluable..." ––
"...indispensable..."
http://ICBTollFree.com –– http://1800TheExpert.com ––  (U.S.) 1 800 The
Expert
Judith Oppenheimer –– mailto:joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com ––  +1 212
684-7210


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-b@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-b@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 3:14 AM
To: wg-b@dnso.org
Cc: Michael D. Palage Chair WG B
Subject: Re: [wg-b] WG-B Report


At the Names Council meeting yesterday the status of the WG B report
submitted was explained to the NC by both Kathy Kleiman and myself. The
report will be posted for public comment.

In the meantime, the NC understands that the sunrise proposal has not been
fully discussed by WG B and the NC urges rapid discussion of this item with
a view to a report with an amended section on this item by May 10. That
report will be reviewed by the NC at a meeting probably taking place week
commencing May 15.

Philip.

Philip Sheppard
WG B Co NC liaison