[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [wg-b] me thinks thou dost protect too much ...
Peter, that tm owners consider perceived offences against their marks as
equally serious to pedestrians' bodily harm or death, would not surprise me
But the accurate analogy would be the trademark owners' propensity to
hit-and-run, and to 'drive [the process] drunk (on their own illusions of
supremacy over "pedestrians" ...)
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [wg-b] me thinks thou dost protect too much ...
Not to put too fine a point on it: Probably fewer than a fraction of 1% of
all pedestrians get run over by cars in any given year. Nevertheless, when
it does happen, it's pretty serious.
______________________________ Reply Separator
Subject: [wg-b] me thinks thou dost protect too much ... Author:
firstname.lastname@example.org at INTERNET
Date: 4/7/00 12:50 PM
According to this at http://nsol.com/statistics/fun/fun.html, fewer than 1%
of domain name registrants purchase "cybersquatter"-level volumes of domain
And we know that many of those in that fewer-than-1% category, are
themselves trademark-owning large corporations.
Which means the career "cybersquatter" element so hysterically denounced by
tm-ers is merely a fraction of that fewer-than-1% of people purchasing
Ergo, is the tm lobby not getting far too much policy attention and
preference, relative to this truly insignificant degree of potential
How Many Domain Names
Do People Register?