[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-b] Points of agreement

To: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
Subject: RE: [wg-b] Points of agreement
From: Mikki Barry <ooblick@netpolicy.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 10:03:33 -0500
Cc: "'Harald Tveit Alvestrand'" <Harald@alvestrand.no>, "Hartman, Steve" <HartmanS@Nabisco.com>, wg-b@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <6751E347E374D211857100A0C92563DCA8A1B1@MAILDC>
References: <6751E347E374D211857100A0C92563DCA8A1B1@MAILDC>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

At 9:26 AM -0500 12/16/99, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
>Can we agree to work on a definition, using WIPO's Standing Committee's work
>and perhaps other well accepted legal texts?  Marilyn

I don't agree with using WIPO's work when its own "Board of Experts" 
disagreed with it.

References:
- RE: [wg-b] Points of agreement
  - From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
- RE: [wg-b] Points of agreement
  - From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-b] Points of agreement
Next by Date: Re: [wg-b] How would .fame work?
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-b] Points of agreement
Next by thread: RE: [wg-b] Points of agreement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread