[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-b] Position Papers

And Germany

		-----Original Message-----
		From:	Martin B. Schwimmer [mailto:martys@interport.net]
		Sent:	Monday, December 13, 1999 5:29 PM
		To:	wg-b@dnso.org
		Subject:	Re: [wg-b] Position Papers

		>Similarly, a concern about oreos might be reflected in a
domain name such as 
		>oreo-lovers.org or hydrox-versus-oreo-compare.com.

		neither of which would be affected by a dead hit exclusion
of oreo.

		btw, it does not go without saying that the use of either of
these names is
		per se lawful.  the second one, for example, would be per se
unlawful in
		South Africa, where comparative advertising identifying
brands is prohibited. 

		@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @