[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [wg-b] Revised Draft Ballot
Joop, I want to better understand your request to Michael. I had seen
option B and C as separate. One reads that there are mechanisms external to
ICANN which are adequate... and the second that such mechanisms wouldn't be
in ICANN's authority anyway. By the way, I saw Option A as being neutral on
who should develop such mechanism for the protection of famous marks. For
instance, and I would see this being discussed further, so do consider it a
very high level suggestion which requires much further thought and
discussion, it might be that the mechanism would be developed by WIPO and
recognized by ICANN, after vetting/review, comments, etc.
Could you explain more about why you suggest combining the options B and C?
I wonder if it might be that the options aren't mutually exclusive? Which I
would agree. I'm wondering about maybe a two part question: with a) and b)
which could both be voted separately.
Just to be clear, so no one thinks I'm being disingenuous. I personally will
vote Option 1, but I am all for clarity on the questions...
In any case, I value your thoughts and wanted to ask for more elaboration,
if you don't mind. best regards, Marilyn
From: Joop Teernstra [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 1999 9:39 PM
To: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
Subject: Re: [wg-b] Revised Draft Ballot
At 05:45 PM 17/10/1999 -0400, Michael D. Palage wrote:
>[Please select ONE of the options listed below]
> Option A - Some type of mechanism, yet to be determined, is necessary in
>connection with famous trademarks and the operation of the Domain Name
> Option B - ICANN should not implement any mechanism for the protection
>famous marks, because other mechanisms are adequate
> Option C - ICANN should not implement any mechanism for the protection
>famous marks, because it exceeds the scope of ICANN's authority
> Option D - I choose to abstain from the voting process at this time
Michael, could you please add an option that combines both B and C?
--Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- , bootstrap of
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners