[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate
But I don't see where ANY of it is enforcable. This is a critical issue.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of
> Milton Mueller
> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 1999 4:10 PM
> To: d3nnis
> Cc: Esther Dyson; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [wg-b] Re: ICANN's Mandate
> You are beginning to get a handle on what ICANN is all about.
> d3nnis wrote:
> > By issuing it as a "policy" statement though, the Department of
> > Commerce has achieved the effect of creating new law which has
> > slipped out of the due process arena. In addition, because it is
> > officially "not law", it is insulated from Constitutional challenges.
> m i l t o n m u e l l e r // m u e l l e r @ s y r . e d u
> syracuse university http://istweb.syr.edu/~mueller/