[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
At 04:11 06.09.99 -0700, d3nnis wrote:
>Sorry, your statement isn't accurate.
>Domain names alone are not trademarks in US statutes or in case law.
>Infringement cases have required that the site itself contain infringing
in the case of alleged cybersquatting, mere possession of the domain name,
without a corresponding believable claim to rights in the name, has been
reason to take administrative action (under both the old NSI resolution
policy and the new proposed ADRP).
It would be "interesting" to see this policy declared to have no basis at
all in applicable law :-)
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Maxware, Norway