[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] RE: opportunity to pre-empt, or license to infringe?

To: "Hartman, Steve" <HartmanS@Nabisco.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-b] RE: opportunity to pre-empt, or license to infringe?
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 07:57:27 +0900
Cc: "'Judith Oppenheimer'" <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>, "'John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D.'" <john@johnberryhill.com>, wg-b@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <0B50DCAF2448D311BA0300805F3198593E5F0E@NS_MSG_P1.nabisco.com>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

At 14:45 20-04-2000 -0400, Hartman, Steve wrote:
>In my judgment speculation in the trademarks of others unnecessarily drives
>up the cost of doing business on the Internet and reduces the efficiency of
>the Internet, with no countervailing benefits.

Steve, whoever you are, them's my sentiments:-)  Your're right 
on!  Regards, BobC

References:
- [wg-b] RE: opportunity to pre-empt, or license to infringe?
  - From: "Hartman, Steve" <HartmanS@Nabisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-b] RE: opportunity to pre-empt, or license to infringe?
Next by Date: Rita, Wanita, ask my soul if we should part! Re: [wg-b] A Hands-Down Consensus Winner!
Prev by thread: [wg-b] opportunity to pre-empt, or license to infringe?
Next by thread: RE: [wg-b] RE: opportunity to pre-empt, or license to infringe?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread