[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] Comments on TM Sunrise +20 (-20)

To: wg-b@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-b] Comments on TM Sunrise +20 (-20)
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 15:49:28 +0900
In-Reply-To: <38FCDB93.4EF66054@syr.edu>
References: <0B50DCAF2448D311BA0300805F3198593E5EF5@NS_MSG_P1.nabisco.com><014501bfa972$a0fc04e0$3401010a@ddhs.com>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

At 18:02 18-04-2000 -0400, Milton Mueller wrote:

>* sunrise means a retreat from what is now conceded to be an untenable idea of
>a famous marks list.
>
>Dear Uncle Milt:

I don't consider the idea "untenable".  Or are you one of those anti WTO 
demonstrators?  You would cancel TRIPS?

>In short, this is a compromise and like all politically-dictated 
>compromises it
>is unsightly and morally objectionable to those of us with a principled 
>view of
>the issue.

Do you have some kind of monopoly on "principled views"?  Is a view which 
differs from your "unprincipled"?

BobC

References:
- RE: TM Sunrise +20 (Re: [wg-b] WG-B Report -Take II)
  - From: "Hartman, Steve" <HartmanS@Nabisco.com>
- Re: TM Sunrise +20 (Re: [wg-b] WG-B Report -Take II)
  - From: "John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <john@johnberryhill.com>
- [wg-b] Comments on TM Sunrise +20 (-20)
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-b] WG-B Report
Next by Date: Re: [wg-b] WG-B Report
Prev by thread: [wg-b] Comments on TM Sunrise +20 (-20)
Next by thread: [wg-b] Citation of the Day re: Sunrise Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread