[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] Re: WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection

To: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>
Subject: Re: [wg-b] Re: WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection
From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 02:15:29 -0400
CC: wg-b@dnso.org
References: <3.0.2.32.19991005110932.00da54bc@pop.interport.net> <F5119A1B56E2D2119B580008C7BF699F209381@mpaabeexchange.mpaa .org> <3.0.2.32.19991006182959.00d9e0b0@pop.interport.net>
Reply-To: mueller@syr.edu
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

Religion and culture = can of worms.
Commercial trademarks for western multinationals = sacred cow

Martin B. Schwimmer wrote:

> WIPO earlier rejected the idea of a protected name list (religions,
> medicines, etc.) as too much of a can of worms at this time).

--
m i l t o n   m u e l l e r // m u e l l e r @ s y r . e d u
syracuse university          http://istweb.syr.edu/~mueller/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-b] Re: WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@alvestrand.no>

References:
- RE: [wg-b] Straw Vote Results
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>
- [wg-b] Re: WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>

Prev by Date: [wg-b] "ICANN has neither the authority nor the resources" - Mike Roberts
Next by Date: Re: [wg-b] Re: WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection
Prev by thread: [wg-b] Re: WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection
Next by thread: Re: [wg-b] Re: WIPO as an argument for famous marks protection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread