[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IFWP] Re: [dnso.discuss] Modifications to ICIIU Guidelines and NCDNHC definition



William and all,

William X. Walsh wrote:

> Oh spare me Jeff.  If I thought Michael would be a serious and
> qualified leader for this constituency and would serve the role of
> their representative in a positive fashion, he'd have my support.

  It is clearly obvious that Michael Sondow IS attempting to serve
the role of representative of the NCDNHC in a positive manner
as he perports to want to keep that organization reserved for
strictly non-commercial members.  That is positive by any reasonable
measure that is honest as it is supposed to be for non-commercial
Domain name holders.  Any deviation of that basic principal would
serve only a negative subversion of such a constituency.

>
>
> But I have serious concerns over someone who would form an
> organization for the sole purpose of trying to gain credibility that
> he so terribly failed to obtain as an individual.

  This is yet again YOUR "Witch Hunt" as Richard so aptly put it.
It has nothing what so ever to do with the formation or representation
that Michael is providing the NCDNHC.

>
>
> Why do you have to insist on turning this into something much lower
> than that?

  I am not, I am only point up and point out in my response to Richards
comments how it appears glaringly YOUR overwhelming propensity for
casting false aspersions against Michael, for what ever perverse and
twisted reasons you may have.  As such, I found that RIchards response
to you in his comments very much to the point.

>
>
> On Tue, 01 Jun 1999 13:34:06 +0100, Jeff Williams
> <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> >William, Richard and all,
> >
> >  Sounds allot like a "Sour Grapes" response from William here to me.
> >
> >  I seems that you hit a nerve here on William Richard.  >;)  None the less
> >I believe that you were "Spot On", personally..  Good man there Richard!
> >>;)
> >
> >William X. Walsh wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 09:12:32 -0400 (EDT), "Richard J. Sexton"
> >> <richard@dns.list> wrote:
> >>
> >> >>I could go and incorporate the "Comedian Domain Name Holders Congress"
> >> >>tomorrow, but that doesn't mean that it has any validity in this
> >> >>process.
> >> >
> >> >Well yeah, but there's talk and there's actions. I've seen you
> >> >talk and I've seen Michael act.
> >>
> >> There mere act is not enough to make a leader.
> >>
> >> And I'm not suggesting >>I<< belong in that role, either, Richard.
> >>
> >> So your comment (which borders on a personal attack I would think is
> >> beneath you) is invalid anyway.
> >>
> >> --
> >> William X. Walsh william@dso.net
> >> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
> >> Fax:(209) 671-7934
> >>
> >> The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go
> >> crying to every time you have something
> >> to whimper about.
> >
> >Regards,

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208