Re: do we want to have constituency meetings in singapore next month?

[Sascha Ignjatovic <sascha@isoc.vienna.org>]

thank you for the nice way how you answered this mail 

i/we wish you all
all the best for the forthcomming work and cooperation

thanks
sascha

On Fri, 12 Feb 1999, Andrew Q. Kraft, MAIP, Executive Director wrote:

> Sascha Ignjatovic wrote:
> > why you folks continue to present this "paris/draft/aplication"
> > as the "one and only"
> 
> Um, Sascha...I didn't. If you look closely at the email that I wrote, I
> actually suggested that the first half of the first day be a meeting in
> which the two proposals, the Paris proposal and the DNSO.org proposal.
> 
> > it was "done" only by 3 organisations-of wich one is a privat monopolistic
> > company  but you continue to understand and present your self as something
> > "very importend" and maker of the game...
> 
> It was actually created in a public forum, with final edits at the Paris
> meeting. I am not in any way deprecating the DNSO.org draft, which I think
> has great points and has strengths, actually, where the Paris draft has
> weaknesses.
> 
> Please also consider that although there were only 3 sponsoring
> organizations at the time the draft was put forth, many others have come on
> board (as they couldn't get approvals in in time for February 5th).
> 
> In any case, regardless of what accusations have transpired on the various
> lists (and that is both ways...people in BOTH camps are being petty and
> taking attacks at the others instead of sitting down to the real issues),
> there are two drafts on the table. I proposed only that the schedule in
> Singapore be used to help facilitate that coming together. That is all. The
> Paris is not the only draft. And in AIP's opinion, it is only SLIGHTLY
> better than DNSO.org's draft. So let's all stop bickering, sit down, and
> make this thing work!
> 
> > do you sugest  that your commented paris/draf/aplication is the BASIS for
> > the DNSO and ICANN  should aprove it or not ... ?
> 
> No. Actually I am hoping that the Paris and DNSO.org proposals can come
> together and that a MERGER of the two is what ICANN can approve. If I gave
> the impression that the Paris was the only draft, I apologize, but I think I
> was pretty clear, by the very fact that I suggested a merger meeting on the
> first morning, that I believe there are two valid proposals on the table.
> 
> Sincerely and respectfully,
> Andrew
> -- 
> Andrew Q. Kraft, MAIP
> Executive Director, Association of Internet Professionals (AIP)
> Email:      akraft@association.org
> Phone:      310-724-6589
> More Info:  http://www.association.org/
> 
>