[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Merge draft
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:47:49 -0500
- From: "Antony Van Couvering" <email@example.com>
- Subject: RE: Merge draft
The "merged" draft most definitively does *not* replace the Dec. 16 DNSO.ORG
consensus draft. It is rather an extracurricular attempt to find a
compromise between the DNSO.ORG consensus draft and other drafts and
comments. Since just today ORSC, after promising to do so, and AIP, with no
warning at all, have issued separate drafts, it is already out of date in
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of
> Ellen Rony
> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 11:33 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Merge draft
> Could someone(s) please help me cut to the chase on the various DNSO
> drafts, so I can complete the proposal comparison page at
> * Should the January 17 DNSO.ORG "merged" draft *replace* the
> December 16 one?
> * Does ORSC have a later version?
> * I'll add AIP's draft, but have any other full-fleshed DNSO
> proposals been
> A comparison table with more than five columns gets unwieldy, but it's too
> late to change formats.
> Ellen Rony Co-author
> The Domain Name Handbook http://www.domainhandbook.com
> ================================ // ===================================
> ISBN 0879305150 *=" ____ / +1 (415) 435-5010
> email@example.com \ ) Tiburon, CA
> // \\ "Carpe canine"