[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [registrars] Moving the gTLD debate forward...
Timothy Denton wrote:
> I again smell bad faith in proposals of the sort that say: "well, WG-B could
> not come up with consensus on tghe means for the protection of famous names
> so we obviously cannot have new TLD's."
What's your mission, ...... to stall the whole debate????
I don't smell that aroma ....and to make sure, I think it would be prudent for
the NC to keep the ball moving forward by recognizing the areas of consensus and
giving a broad and positive path for the Board to consider the introduction of
new gTLDs..... in the knowledge they have the full support of the Registrar
If you want to wait until WG B comes to consensus, or prefer the NC to bring the
current consensus points together in a manner that the Board can take it to the
next stage.. please state your preference?? The reason for asking the question
is to specifically avoid the "smell" and to send a clear message to the Board
that they should move forward with this most pressing issue.
Since my earlier mail I have received a significant number of private emails
requesting me to vote in a manner that moves the debate move forward, if you
want to stall the debate, please say so, justifying your reasons. I welcome