DNSO Archives: [registrars]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Some bylaw thoughts and questions

To: "Paul Stahura" <stahura@enom.com>, "Registrars Mail List" <registrars@dnso.org>
Subject: RE: [registrars] Some bylaw thoughts and questions
From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 11:51:57 -0400
Sender: owner-registrars@dnso.org
Thread-Index: AcMLQCz2li1TEiRaQNuC9cyd8JQmZgAAcpyA
Thread-Topic: [registrars] Some bylaw thoughts and questions

the current language allows only one vote in that situation:

4.5.1.3. ... Where a Member owns 51% or more of the voting shares of one or more ICANN Accredited Registrars, that Member shall be limited to one (1) vote.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Stahura [mailto:stahura@enom.com]
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Registrars Mail List
Subject: RE: [registrars] Some bylaw thoughts and questions

Elana,

you said
4.5.1.3. - i'd like to see 1 vote per registrar, no matter who owns them  

Does that mean if eNom owned 5 ICANN accredited registrars, I'd get 5 votes?

Paul

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>