RE: [registrars] Proposed Ballots

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>]

I disagree. I don't think being "concerned with IP interests"
necessarily translates into the amendments you are proposing. I think
Ross' amendment should stand as it is and not draw anything more
specific into it.

Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On
Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Elana Broitman; ross@tucows.com; registrars@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [registrars] Proposed Ballots

I would like to propose an additional revision to the amendment which
would include a reference to intellectual property interests as follows:

 
"At the same time, the Registrar Constituency recognizes that there may
be a number of legitimate reasons, including the protection of
intellectual property,  ....
 
"...the Registrar Constituency proposes that the GNSO Council's Privacy
Task Force review privacy and intellectual property concerns ...
 
These changes would make it clear that the registrar consituency is
concerned about intellectual property interests and would make it more
likely that the other consituencies would support the registrar position
on this issue.
 
Regards,
 
Margie
 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Elana Broitman [mailto:ebroitman@register.com] 
	Sent: Wed 4/9/2003 8:05 AM 
	To: ross@tucows.com; registrars@dnso.org 
	Cc: 
	Subject: RE: [registrars] Proposed Ballots
	
	

	Ross - this looks good - I would support this as a friendly
amendment.
	
	Mike - can we get this on the ballot please?
	
	-----Original Message-----
	From: ross@tucows.com
	Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 9:24 PM
	To: registrars@dnso.org
	Cc: Elana Broitman
	Subject: RE: [registrars] Proposed Ballots
	
	
	> Same here Rob. I had earlier considered attempting to put
together an
	> amendment to this motion
	
	Elana, I'd like to put forward the following as a friendly
amendmentto
	your earlier motion...
	
	Members of the GNSO Registrar Constituency continue to see abuse
of
	public Whois databases by spammers, hijackers and  others
intending to
	obtain registrant contact data through  automated or otherwise
	high-volume means for inappropriate purposes.  This raises
significant
	privacy, technical and operational concerns for consumers,
privacy
	advocates, registrars and registries.  At the same time, the
Registrar
	Constituency recognizes that there may be a number of
legitimate
	reasons why key stakeholders may seek to obtain  this same
contact
	information through sanctioned means.
	
	In order to ensure an appropriate balance for all interests, the
	Registrar Constituency proposes that the GNSO Council's Privacy
Task
	Force review privacy concerns related to the Whois protocol,
service and
	contractual data provisioning requirements for ICANN gTLD
registrars and
	registries and make recommendations to limit the availability of
such
	data only to legitimate interests and uses, protect it from
unauthorized
	use and review whether or not the Whois protocol and service
itself may
	be better replaced by a more appropriate alternative.
	
	[] I support the statement as a formal position of the Registrar
	Constituency;
	[] I  do not support the statement as a formal position of the
Registrar
	Consituency;
	[] Abstain.
	
	PS - are we gonna vote on any of this anytime soon? I'm getting
ballot
	withdrawal. :)
	
	-rwr