<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Initial Report
Tim - where is the mailing list archived for this task force? The last
reference that I find on the GNSO website is dated January 31, 2003.
Thanks in advance,
-rwr
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:04 AM
> To: 'GNSO Registrars'
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Initial Report
>
>
> I believe I will withdraw my request for a vote on this
> report for now. The Task Force has already been back at it,
> and we have agreed to mention the two additional issues that
> are noted in the ballot below. However, they will not be
> added as formal recommendations from the Task Force. I
> believe this is a reasonable approach.
>
> The final report is close to completion and may be ready to
> post by the time we get this vote completed. So I think at
> this point it would be best to hold off and vote on the final
> report instead.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@godaddy.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 10:48 AM
> To: 'Tim Ruiz'; 'GNSO Registrars'
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Initial Report
>
> I have let this set due to the recent votes. There have been
> no other amendments to this ballot put forward. I would now
> like to call for a vote on the ballot below.
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:11 AM
> To: ross@tucows.com; 'GNSO Registrars'
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Intial Report
>
> The amendment proposed by Ross has been incorporated into the
> ballot below.
>
> Discussion of the ballot should conclude on Sunday at 3:00PM
> EST. Voting should open no later than Tuesday and close after
> 48 hours. Rick, if I can assist in setting this up please let me know.
>
> <ballot>
>
> The GNSO Council's Deletes Task Force has issued its initial
> report. This report addresses issues related to registrar and
> registry deletion practices and makes three recommendations.
> The result of this vote will be the basis for building an
> official constituency position statement in response to the report.
>
> Two additional recommendations related to the Deletes Task
> Force work have been proposed based on discussions at the
> recent joint Registrar-Registry Constituency meeting held in
> Washington DC.
>
> Recommendation to modify the registry auto-renew process:
>
> On the day of expiration the domain enters the auto-renew
> grace period (currently 45 days). The expiration date is NOT
> advanced. The registrar is NOT charged.
>
> On the last day of the auto-renew grace period, if the domain
> has not been explicitly deleted or explicitly renewed, the
> expiration date is advanced one year and the registrar is
> charged for the renewal.
>
> Recommendation to reinstate the 5-day pending grace period:
>
> Domains deleted at any time other than during the Add Grace
> Period enter a 5-day pending delete grace period after which
> the domain is then placed in the Redemption Grace Period.
>
>
> [] I support the recommendations in the Deletes Task Force report;
>
> [] I support the recommendations in the Deletes Task Force
> report with the additional recommendations;
>
> [] I cannot support the recommendations in the Deletes Task
> Force report;
>
> [] Abstain.
>
> </ballot>
>
> Tim
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:45 AM
> To: 'Tim Ruiz'; 'GNSO Registrars'
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Intial Report
>
> Tucows happily seconds this motion and offers a friendly
> amendment that the text of the ballot includes the substance
> of the proposal set forth in DC rather than a reference to it.
>
> We also propose that discussion on this ballot closes by the
> end of this week (Sunday?) given the substantial discussion
> that we have already devoted to the subject both on this list
> and in DC.
>
>
>
> -rwr
>
>
>
>
> "There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the
> shore like an idiot."
> - Steven Wright
>
> Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org
> > [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:52 PM
> > To: 'GNSO Registrars'
> > Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Intial Report
> >
> >
> > I formally move that we vote on the Deletes Task Force report
> > using the following ballot:
> >
> > The GNSO Council's Deletes Task Force has issued its initial
> > report. This report addresses issues related to registrar and
> > registry deletion practices and makes three recommendations.
> > The result of this vote will be the basis for building an
> > official constituency position statement in response to the report.
> >
> > [] I support the recommendations in the Deletes Task Force
> > report; [] I support the recommendations in the Deletes Task
> > Force report with the addition of recommendations to modify
> > the registry auto-renew process and to reinstate the 5-day
> > grace period after deletion of a domain name and prior to it
> > entering the Redemption Grace Period, both as discussed at
> > the recent joint Registrar-Registry Constituency meeting held
> > in Washington DC; [] I cannot support the recommendations in
> > the Deletes Task Force report; [] Abstain.
> >
> > A supporting document will be listed under Referenced Items,
> > and will read as follows:
> >
> > Modified registry auto-renew process:
> >
> > On the day of expiration the domain enters the auto-renew
> > grace period (currently 45 days). The expiration date is NOT
> > advanced. The registrar is NOT charged.
> >
> > On the last day of the auto-renew grace period, if the domain
> > has not been explicitly deleted or explicitly renewed, the
> > expiration date is advanced one year and the registrar is
> > charged for the renewal.
> >
> > Reinstating the 5-day pending grace period:
> >
> > Domains deleted at any time other than during the Add Grace
> > Period enter a 5-day pending delete grace period (currently
> > missing) after which the domain is then placed in the
> > Redemption Grace Period.
> >
> > Discussion? Second?
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org
> > [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf > Of Tim Ruiz
> >
> > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 6:17 PM
> > To: GNSO Registrars
> > Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Intial Report
> >
> > The public comment period for the initial report closes on
> > March 3rd. We briefly discussed the report at the RC meeting
> > in DC, which resulted in the raising of a related but
> > separate issue. There have been no other comments from
> > registrars regarding the initial report.
> >
> > I would like to request at this time that we proceed with a
> > vote on the Deletes TF Initial Report, after which we will
> > work on producing a position statement in response to the report.
> >
> > Rick, will you need a formal motion and second to get this started?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 6:48 AM
> > To: registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: [registrars] Deletes Task Force Intial Report
> >
> >
> > I failed to notify the list that the Deletes Task Force
> > Initial Report has been posted and is open for public comment
> > until March 3, 2003.
> >
> > The report is posted at:
> > http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20030211.Delete>
> sTF-initial-report.html
> >
> > Comments should be submitted to:
> > comments-deletes@dnso.org
> >
> > The comment archive is available at:
> > http://www.dnso.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments> -deletes/Arc02/
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|