RE: [registrars] Rejection transfer requests 30-45 days prior to expiration.

[Gary Boyd <Gary.Boyd@netbenefit.com>]

Many of our customer experience this problem. It appears to be applicable to
individuals that have a NSI retail account.

Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Joyce Lin [mailto:joyce@007names.com]
Sent: 17 March 2003 22:01
To: Registrar Constituency; Barbara Lawrence
Subject: Re: [registrars] Rejection transfer requests 30-45 days prior
to expiration.


One of our clients was told sometime last year by Net Sol that he could not
transfer serveral of his domain names that were 28 days to expiration.  This
customer of ours is a lawyer and he asked Net Sol support person where in
the contract has spelled out that 30 dyas terms and was told that it is not
in the contract.  He was forced to pay for the renewals eventually because
Net Sol won't release them.  He insisted that I bring this issue to ICANN
but we all know that ICANN can not help him so I did not.

Joyce
007names.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Barbara Lawrence" <barbara@domainit.com>
To: "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [registrars] Rejection transfer requests 30-45 days prior to
expiration.


> Bob,
>
> Our experience has been that both Net Sol and Register.com automatically
reject registrar transfers that have 30 days or less before expiration.
>
> Regards,
> Barbara Lawrence
>
> At 07:50 AM 3/17/03 -0800, Robert F. Connelly wrote:
> >Dear Colleagues:
> >
> >In the past, there has been traffic on this list about the practice of
some registrars nacking  automatically if the expiration date will come less
than 30 (or even more) days.
> >
> >Is the practice being used by any of our registrars?  How does the
Transfer TF report address this practice?
> >
> >Your counsel, wise and otherwise will be greatly appreciated;-)
> >
> >Cordially, BobC
> >
> >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >"It doesn't do any good to run
> >if you don't start on time!"
> >
> >"A stitch in time saves nine."
> >
>
>



This email has been scanned for viruses by NetBenefit using Sophos
anti-virus technology



This email has been scanned for viruses by NetBenefit using Sophos anti-virus technology