ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Recovery during grace period.


We designed the RGP system according to the specifications that were
developed via ICANN processes.  To my recollection, this specific issue was
never addressed; at least, I was never involved in any exchanges about it.
Unfortunately with regard to the 5-day 'pending delete' period for deletes
not occurring during a grace period, the requirements said that a name
should immediately go into the RGP period.

If there is consensus on changing this, it should be worked through ICANN
processes as quickly as possible.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Bhavin Turakhia [mailto:bhavin.t@directi.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:44 AM
To: 'JP'; 'Robert F. Connelly'; 'Registrar Constituency'
Cc: 'Chuck Gomes'
Subject: RE: [registrars] Recovery during grace period.


This is definetly incorrect - there was NO TALK of sacrificing the 5 day
registry hold in lieu of the redemption grace period. The hold period
has to remain (RRP defines a delete grace period). I hope verisign can
provide some clarification here

bhavin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of JP
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:53 PM
> To: Robert F. Connelly; Registrar Constituency
> Cc: Chuck Gomes
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Recovery during grace period.
> 
> 
> 
> We are having the same problem.
> 
> I remember almost everybody agreeing to the redemption 
> period, in ADDITION to the 5 days. Did any Registrar agreed 
> to give up the 5 days?
> 
> JP
> 
> > From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> > Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 07:52:21 -0800
> > To: Registrar Constituency <registrars@dnso.org>
> > Cc: Chuck Gomes <cgomes@verisign.com>
> > Subject: [registrars] Recovery during grace period.
> > 
> > Dear Colleagues:
> > 
> > We were surprised at one aspect of the implementation of the Delete 
> > Redemption system.
> > 
> > As you will remember, when a domain was deleted in the past, it was 
> > placed on registry-hold for five days.  I was expecting that the 
> > redemption grace period would begin after the five days on 
> > registry-hold.
> > 
> > We had an inadvertent deletion on 2 February, I caught it within 8 
> > hours.  But it was already on the Redemption Grace status.  
> Not only 
> > is it costing us $85 now, but the system is flawed.  We 
> completed the 
> > Redemption Report 24 hours ago but the domain is still in limbo.  I 
> > called Verisign just now and was promised an answer in 3 hours.
> > 
> > Any other experiences with Redemption Grace?
> > 
> > Regards, BobC
> > 
> 
> 
> 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>