RE: [registrars] Fw: Principles

["Rob Hall" <rob@momentous.com>]

If the Authentication request is to be standardized, then Yes.

In your scenario, if the Gaining is handling authentication, they should
send both.  English and whatever language they choose.

Rob.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Rob Hall; Robert F. Connelly; Registrar Constituency
Cc: Gomes, Chuck
Subject: Re: [registrars] Fw: Principles


"Remember, under these principals, it could be the losing Registrar that is
handling the authentication of the request. "

Also note that these principles don't preclude the Gaining Registrar from
handling the request. Should the Gaining Registrar be required to send out a
bilingual notice in the event that the Registrants preference is for a
language other than English?

I think I'm with Bob on this one.

-rwr

----- Original Message -----
From: Rob Hall
To: Robert F. Connelly ; Registrar Constituency
Cc: Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: [registrars] Fw: Principles


Bob,

The point is not whether a losing registrar will be forced to send it in
Japanese.  The point is he Registrar MUST at least send it in Engligh.
EITHER Registrar can then send more information in a different language.
Remember, under these principals, it could be the losing Registrar that is
handling the authentication of the request.  What I would not want to see
happen is that the losing Registrar is able to send the notice ONLY in
whatever language they want.  They should be free to send it IN ADDITION TO,
but not ONLY.

What could be easily gamed, is that we could decide as the losing registrar
to only send the authentication in Latin.  While I should be able to send it
in Latin, I should also have to send it in English.  Especially if I am the
sole Registrar responsible for the Authentication.
Rob.


 -----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On Behalf
Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Registrar Constituency
Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Duane Connelly; Mieko Umezu
Subject: RE: [registrars] Fw: Principles


At 11:52 AM 11/29/02 -0500, Rob Hall wrote:

Robert,

To me, this clause reads that you must at least send the notification in
english.  However, you can also send it in any other language you want, as
well as sending instructions in any other language you want.

Dear Rob:  I don't see it that way.  English is mandatory.  I'd like to see
a life sized picture of *you* sending a Japanese message to a Japanese
registrant who is trying to transfer *out_of* you as the registraR;-(

Read that "may", below, and see what you think are the chances that a non
Japanese registraR will send the alternate message in Japanese?

Regards, BobC



Rob.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Registrar Constituency
Cc: Gomes, Chuck
Subject: Re: [registrars] Fw: Principles
Importance: High


At 05:14 PM 11/27/02 -0500, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
>8.                  English is the mandatory default language for all
>registrar, registry and registrant transfer communications.  Additionally,
>registrars may communicate with registrants in other languages provided
that
>the principle of standardization in principle 5 above is satisfied.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Never underestimate the power of inertia;-}