Re: [registrars] Consensus Building

["erica" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>]

Hi Bob,
I think we share a sense of frustration here.  But we can't blame ICANN - it
is up to the RC to put a proposal to the NC so that a DNSO position can be
developed.  So far, the RC has not referred the draft CoC to the NC so the
DNSO has not been able to develop a position on the issue.

erica
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
To: "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: [registrars] Consensus Building


> At 07:12 PM 9/27/01 +0800, erica wrote:
> >It is perhaps worth reflecting that this may not have happened if the RC
had
> >forwarded the draft CoC to the NC for discussion and comment by other
> >constituencies.  It is not too late to do this and thus to progress the
> >issue.
> >
> >erica
>
> Dear Erica:  I've mentioned it several times.  The Escrow system is
another
> example of the lack of follow up by ICANN.
>
> Regards, BobC
>
>