DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Consensus Building

It is perhaps worth reflecting that this may not have happened if the RC had
forwarded the draft CoC to the NC for discussion and comment by other
constituencies.  It is not too late to do this and thus to progress the

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
To: "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: [registrars] Consensus Building

> At 11:37 AM 9/26/01 -0400, Michael D. Palage wrote:
> >After over 12 months of heated internal debate the final
> >document was less than originally intended and it basically withered and
> >died on the vine.
> Dear Michael:  Sadly true:-( BobC

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>