[registrars] policy development

[Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>]

Well I think the issue is between voluntary standards developed within the
constituency, and changes to agreements that need to go through a long
process and the ICANN Board and become mandatory rather than voluntary.

It would be good if registrars could at least start to agree on the former
as a first step to the latter.

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert F. Connelly [mailto:rconnell@psi-japan.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 9:37 AM
> To: Registrar Constituency
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Fw: [council] Policies Concerning Allocation
> of Expiring Names in .com/.net/.org
> 
> 
> At 09:32 AM 7/19/01 +1000, Liz Williams wrote:
> 
> >Despair not!  After the elections are held you'll see lots 
> of lovely fresh
> >faces around the place willing and able to steer your morgue 
> list below and
> >many others to policy fruition.
> 
> Dear Liz:  We're told the disconnect was between the 
> constituency and the 
> Names Council and/or between the Names Council and the ICANN Board.
> 
> Regards, BobC
> 
>