RE: [registrars] Please comment CONSENSUS required...

["Beckwith, Bruce" <bbeckwith@netsol.com>]

Love those spell checkers ;-)

Same note but with the word "constituency" spelled correctly...

-----Original Message-----
From: Beckwith, Bruce 
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 7:02 PM
To: Registrars List
Subject: RE: [registrars] Please comment CONSENSUS required...


All:

The Registrar Constituency Meeting that occurred yesterday (Saturday) in
Melbourne had many substantive and interesting topics discussed.

Please remember that the Registrar Constituency did not take a vote nor did
the Constituency formulate an opinion on the proposed ICANN/VeriSign
agreement.

Regards,

Bruce 

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul M. Kane [mailto:Paul.Kane@REACTO.com]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 8:36 AM
To: Registrars List
Subject: [registrars] Please comment CONSENSUS required...


Fellow Registrars

Today an informal tel conf meeting was held, and thank you all for your
participation.  During the call a number of issues were raised and a a
number of concerns were identified.
The comments have been documented in the attached document and in light
of the Registrar's Constituency meeting to be held on Saturday
(Melbourne time) Friday EST, your input is welcomed on the summary
document attached.

If you have any comments please respond to any of the NC members or to
Mike Palage.

The next stage will be for the NC face to face meeting here in Melbourne
on Sunday and if consensus is reached on the report/issues then the NC
reps will make a report to the Names Council.

Thanks again ... all comments welcomed

Paul