DNSO Archives: [nc-whois]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-whois]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-whois] Voiding bulk access rights?

To: Timothy Denton <tim@tmdenton.com>
Subject: Re: [nc-whois] Voiding bulk access rights?
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 21:19:53 +0200
Cc: nc-whois@dnso.org, Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>, "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
In-Reply-To: <NFBBLOMMOLCJAHDJDLOHEEIPCPAA.tim@tmdenton.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Timothy Denton <tim@tmdenton.com>,nc-whois@dnso.org, Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>,"Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
Organization: Palpatine's office.
References: <20020924180217.GI4265@coruscant.does-not-exist.org> <NFBBLOMMOLCJAHDJDLOHEEIPCPAA.tim@tmdenton.com>
Sender: owner-nc-whois@dnso.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On 2002-09-24 15:01:38 -0400, Timothy Denton wrote:

>They all use throw-away corporations for this purpose.

In that case simply voiding bulk access rights wouldn't create any  
improvement...

-- 
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [nc-whois] Voiding bulk access rights?
  - From: "Timothy Denton" <tim@tmdenton.com>

References:
- [nc-whois] Voiding bulk access rights?
  - From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- RE: [nc-whois] Voiding bulk access rights?
  - From: "Timothy Denton" <tim@tmdenton.com>
- RE: [nc-whois] Voiding bulk access rights?
  - From: "Timothy Denton" <tim@tmdenton.com>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>