RE: [nc-whois] Next steps.....
Folks, can we hear from the rest of you on when you are arriving, and if you
can meet at this time?
From: Antonio Harris [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:23 PM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA; 'Paul M. Kane'; WHOIS Committee - DNSO
Subject: RE: [nc-whois] Next steps.....
Am available as from 3 p.m. on the Sunday
----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Para: "'Paul M. Kane'" <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>; "WHOIS Committee - DNSO"
Enviado: Domingo 21 de Octubre de 2001 23:38
Asunto: RE: [nc-whois] Next steps.....
> I'm pleased to accept the teaming proposal you have put forward. thanks
> your continued leadership.
> I'll continue to try to line up when folks are arriving, and get a
> room in MdR... .
> I do want to caution everyone that beginning 8:00 am. 11/12, some of us
> back to back commitments ---since we are elected reps to constituencies.
> Let's try for a Sunday afternoon meeting a bit earlier than you suggested:
> like in the p.m. Sunday for 2-3 hours-- I'd suggest maybe 3-6:00 p.m. or
> 4-6:00 p.m. Let's see if we have critical mass for a working session,
> if all can't be available....
> I suspect most of us already have dinner plans and working commitments on
> Sunday to prepare for the rest of the week.
> And, it's important to have this meeting before 11/12, so that we can
> provide at least a preliminary report/status at the Constituencies and NC
> If we can gather sufficient(5-6)of our members Sunday in this time, we
> should proceed. Then, we can brief our other members before any public
> Then, perhaps we can find another hour later in the meeting.
> Can folks reply once again about availability and arrival.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul M. Kane [mailto:Paul.Kane@reacto.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 2:18 PM
> To: WHOIS Committee - DNSO
> Subject: [nc-whois] Next steps.....
> Hello all
> I am delighted we now have the raw data so we can start the review work.
> I have taken a brief look and the format of the data will help us
> considerably in the evaluation, and I see that ICANN has not "cleaned"
> the data as there are three repetitive entries implying the sender had
> some transit problems in sending in the data to the survey server.
> Appreciating the desire to work in teams of two, a number of you have
> asked that I select the teams at random ... so here goes....
> Miriam Danny
> YJ Marilyn
> Oscar Tony
> Axel Registrar's rep (TBA)
> Next we need to determine the structure of the review.
> May I ask each of you to review at least 100 responses (I would suggest
> 25/30 from each category batch) in advance of your meeting in LA so you
> can (come prepared to) discuss the structure and framework of the
> I would suggest a question by question assessment... remember our task
> is to establish if there was consensus amongst the respondents on a
> specific issue and/or where additional work should be undertaken, and
> the form of that additional work item. Remember the raw data needs to be
> divided amongst the group.
> Due to contractual obligations I will be unable to attend LA, and I hope
> the Registrar's Constituency will be able to appoint a representative to
> the Committee so you can meet face to face in LA. Once the Registrar
> elections are held I will be leaving the Committee so you also need to
> think about the next Chair of the Committee.
> As for the day of the meeting. I have been asked to comment.... but as
> I am not attending, I have no strong views. Sunday afternoon seems the
> easiest to accommodate from a timetable perspective... as ICANN hasn't
> started and most of you will be in LA on Sun eve, but it could be that
> (like MV) two meetings one at the start and one at the end of the ICANN
> event may be beneficial ......
> If a meeting were to be held on Sunday, what time would folks prefer,
> how about .....
> Sunday 6-00pm until 8-00pm (thereby leaving time for dinner meetings
> etc...) - meet at the reception of the Marina Beach Marriott for the
> details of the specific meeting room.
> As mentioned I will not be there, so it is up to you all.... just that I
> was asked to put a proposal on the table!