RE: [nc-whois] Whois Survey data please....
course agree that the sample should be statistical! MC
At 09:36 AM 10/7/2001,
Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
Folks, let's think about what our
request is and what modifications may be
needed to the schedule once we
get the data.
I know we can all by annoyed about the delay, but that
productive. Instead, let's see if we can come up with a
allows us to get some review done, once we get the
I suggested a possible "sample" of perhaps a small number
before (maybe we
all read the same 100 and come up with our agreed to
framework and format?
-- it's only one idea and I would welcome other
suggestions --I didn't see
any response from anyone on that
I could agree on you suggestion but let
me propose to use a statistical formal sample. I recall (it was many years
ago, when I used to be an engineer) there is a formula, depending on the
"expected error": 5%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%. All we need is the total popultation
(numbers of survays answered).
Please Paul, could you tell me this
number? then I will thell you the number needed for this sample in order to
have 5% 1%, 0.5% of expected error.
Let's see if we can do
a little online thinking about how we can proceed and
check schedules for
MdR meetings, etc in the next few days.
but the decision to include security and robustness in ICANN meeting at this
time is completly non sense, so I say, let's stick with our original
Like Y.J., I've got a
full plate with various meetings and want to be sure
that I give
sufficient time to this issue as well.
everybody is busy with too many meetings, but we should reschedule for the
quality of results.
Y.J. merely raising the
issue that we are awaiting data from Louie doesn't
help to address our
need to continue planning on what we will do once we get
the data. I am
not objecting to updating the NC that we don't have the data,
but do you
have some thoughts along the lines of what I proposed which we
a Committee discusss online so we can offer a suggestion for how
proceed? Your response to that or some other ideas from anyone else
be very helpful.
Also, given that 11/12 is tied up already for
constituency meetings, and
perhaps the NC, can we also check feasibility
of coming in in time to meet
Y.J., your schedule will be
pretty challenging, given other commitments you
probably arrive Saturday for a p.m. meeting -- what about others?
From: YJ Park (MINC) [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 07,
2001 2:35 AM
To: Paul M. Kane; WHOIS Committee - DNSO
[nc-whois] Whois Survey data please....
Due to no response from Louis yet with repect to Paul's
made on Oct. 5th, this issue should be raised during the coming
NC teleconference. Since this TF was formed, this TF has
awaiting the data collected by ICANN.
Your comments will be
appreciated regarding this matter.
> Here's another request for the WHOIS data from the
recent DNSO Survey...
> in the formats we have already
> I appreciate you and your staff are busy but we need the
data in order
> to stay on our fairly tight schedule for evaluating
the submissions and
> producing the interim and final report.
> Many thanks