Re: [nc-udrp] Call for Votes - Rule 4(k)
yes with all the onus of notice on the appellant. mac
>>> "John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <email@example.com> 02/28/03 17:03 PM >>>
From: "M. Scott Donahey" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Perhaps since I gave a rationale for the change to 4(k), based on the
reaction of two judges of the Fourth Circuit, someone might post perhaps a
brief rationale the other way.
As Mr. Carmody points out, expecting the registrars to know appellate
deadlines is unreasonable, and some evidence of an actual appeal in progress
should be supplied.
One might assume the intent that the UDRP be subordinate to determinations
under national legal systems would imply that national legal systems be
allowed to run their course, and that the status quo be maintained (pace any
interim orders) during that time. Is there something missing from that line
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination
or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail or by telephone (212-632-5500)
and delete and destroy all copies of the material, including all
copies stored in the recipient's computer, printed or saved to disk.