ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-udrp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-udrp] Another Amusing Pathological UDRP Case


Maybe we need a one-bite rule?

On Fri, 10 May 2002, John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. wrote:

> 
> On the pending list is NAF 113258 <hongdou.com>.
> 
> Interestingly, hongdou.com was the subject of
> http://www.disputes.org/eresolution/decisions/0300.htm
> which decision issued back in September 2000.
> 
> Hmmm.... but whois shows hongdou.com as having been registered in March 2002.
> 
> Yes, you guessed correctly.  The Hongdou folks have figured out how to file
> UDRP cases, but they have not yet figured out how to pay renewal fees for
> their domain name.
> 
> While there are in fact quite a few UDRP-transferred names which have expired
> for non-payment of renewal fees, this is the first one to go back to the
> UDRP.   That's got to be an expensive way to maintain a domain name.
> 
> 

-- 
		Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                        -->It's hot here.<--



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>