<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [nc-udrp] Re: UDRP Questionnaire
{\rtf1\ansi\deff0{\fonttbl{\f0\fmodern\fcharset0 Courier New;}{\f1\fswiss\fprq2 Arial;}}
{\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue255;}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\cf1\lang1033\f0\fs20\par
all kind compliments gratefully received. The answer to your thought out loud question is\par
Sadly, no - if you ever meet my boss - please feel free to tell him!\par
\par
Katrina\par
\par
\pard\li360\cf0\protect\f1\fs16 -----Original Message-----\par
\protect0\pard\protect\fi-1440\li1800\tx1440\b From:\tab\b0 J.Scott Evans [SMTP:jse@adamspat.com]\par
\b Sent:\tab\b0 Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:29 PM\par
\b To:\tab\b0 Katrina Burchell\par
\b Cc:\tab\b0 nc-udrp@dnso.org\par
\b Subject:\tab\b0 [nc-udrp] Re: UDRP Questionnaire\par
\protect0\pard\protect\li360\f0\fs20\par
Katrina:\par
\par
Once again you are my heroine. Thank you. I suppose I could have been as \par
resourceful as you. Does your boss know just how good you are!!! \par
\par
jse \par
\par
Katrina Burchell writes: \par
\par
> \par
> \par
> here is a copy of my response to the questionnaire which I saved (together\par
> with my answers) in case it is of any use. It shows all 56 questions \par
> \par
> Katrina \par
> \par
> -----Original Message-----\par
> From:\tab Chicoine, Caroline G. [SMTP:CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com]\par
> Sent:\tab Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:49 PM\par
> To:\tab 'Dinwoodie, Graeme'; Chicoine, Caroline G.; 'DNSO Secretariat'; 'Louis\par
> Touton'\par
> Cc:\tab 'nc-udrp@dnso.org'\par
> Subject:\tab RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire \par
> \par
> \par
> I have sent another reminder to the secretariat that we desperately need\par
> this. I asked the Secretariat to forward it directly to nc-udrp@dnso.org.\par
> Obviously in light of this delay, I cannot expect people to complete\par
> their responses by Feb 28th. Once it is distributed, I will post a new\par
> deadline. \par
> \par
> While I have a hardcopy, anyone who kept a digital version, if they could\par
> forward to nc-udrp@dnso.org, it would be greatly appreciated. \par
> -----Original Message-----\par
> From: Dinwoodie, Graeme [mailto:GDinwoodie@kentlaw.edu]\par
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 5:24 PM\par
> To: 'Chicoine, Caroline G.'; 'DNSO Secretariat'; 'Louis Touton'\par
> Cc: 'nc-udrp@dnso.org'\par
> Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire \par
> \par
> \par
> \par
> Caroline, \par
> Forgive me if I've missed it, but do we have the link to the\par
> questionnaire? I'm working on the basis of my own shorthand recollection\par
> of the questions, but it would be useful to see the actual document to\par
> which responses were made. Thanks \par
> Graeme \par
> -----Original Message----- \par
> From: Chicoine, Caroline G. [mailto:CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com] \par
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 5:05 PM \par
> To: 'DNSO Secretariat'; 'Louis Touton' \par
> Cc: 'nc-udrp@dnso.org' \par
> Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire \par
> Importance: High \par
> \par
> I have given our Task Force members a Feb 28th deadline to review the \par
> responses from the DNSO version questionnaire, but they can no longer find\par
> a \par
> link to the questionnaire to compare the responses against. Can you\par
> please \par
> provide us a link asap. \par
> Louis, since we do not have the ICANN responses yet, it is not as urgent, \par
> but we will need a link to the ICANN version also at some point. \par
> Thanks \par
> -----Original Message----- \par
> From: Chicoine, Caroline G.\par
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:58 AM \par
> To: 'DNSO Secretariat'; 'Louis Touton' \par
> Cc: 'MSD@tzmm.com' \par
> Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire \par
> \par
> Glen and Louis, can you email the link where are Task Force members can\par
> find \par
> each version? Thanks \par
> -----Original Message----- \par
> From: MSD@tzmm.com [mailto:MSD@tzmm.com] \par
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:47 AM \par
> To: CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com \par
> Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire \par
> \par
> Where can we find a copy of the questionnaire? The results are all\par
> answers, \par
> without the questions. \par
> Best regards. \par
> M. Scott Donahey \par
> Tomlinson Zisko Morosoli & Maser LLP \par
> 200 Page Mill Rd. \par
> Palo Alto, CA 94306 \par
> Phone: (650) 325-8666 \par
> Fax: (650) 324-1808 \par
> msd@tzmm.com \par
> www.tzmm.com \par
> "This email message is for the sole use of the intended \par
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any \par
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If\par
> you \par
> are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email\par
> and \par
> destroy all copies of the original message." \par
> \par
> \par
> -----Original Message----- \par
> From: CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com [mailto:CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com] \par
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:20 AM \par
> To: Katrina.Burchell@unilever.com; nc-udrp@dnso.org \par
> Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire \par
> \par
> I thought long and hard about that, but decided not to put any\par
> constraints. \par
> I would like everyone's comments to be in a summary fashion that\par
> highlights \par
> the good, the bad and the suggestions, trying to be as concise as\par
> possible. \par
> Once we see everyone's summaries, and once we do the same exercise with\par
> the \par
> ICANN responses, we can discuss the summaries and see if we can put\par
> together \par
> a report that represents some sort of consensus. \par
> -----Original Message----- \par
> From: Katrina Burchell [mailto:Katrina.Burchell@unilever.com] \par
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:57 AM \par
> To: nc-udrp@dnso.org \par
> Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire \par
> \par
> Hi \par
> Is there any format in which you want our review of the responses for \par
> which we are responsible posted? \par
> regards \par
> Katrina \par
> -----Original Message----- \par
> From: Chicoine, Caroline G. [SMTP:CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com] \par
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:20 AM \par
> To: 'nc-udrp@dnso.org' \par
> Cc: 'Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us'; 'DNSO Secretariat' \par
> Subject: [nc-udrp] RE: UDRP Questionnaire \par
> Importance: High \par
> We are ready to distribute the response we received to the questionnaire \par
> from the DNSO website. The responses from the ICANN website will follow\par
> in \par
> due course. \par
> To begin with, there the following four individuals apparently did not \par
> receive or respond to my email to confirm that they are in fact receiving \par
> email at the nc_udrp@dnso.org email address: \par
> \par
> gTLD Constituency rep - Jeff Neuman \par
> CPR Provider - F. Peter Phillips \par
> eResolution Provider - Dr. Joelle Thibault \par
> WIPO Provider - Erik Wilbers \par
> \par
> Jeff, since I received an email from you recently, I am asking the \par
> secretariat to confirm that the above email is the email we have of record \par
> in our nc-udrp@dnso.org email distribution list. If you would like us to \par
> use a different email address, please let us know ASAP. \par
> For the others, can their respective panelists try to contact their \par
> providers to get a hold of these individuals? \par
> In total, except for the three Providers mentioned above, we have 21 \par
> members \par
> to review the attached responses. All responses per question can be found \par
> at \par
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/udrp1.txt \par
> Each individual response per questionnaire can be found at \par
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/udrp2.txt \par
> While everyone can look at all the responses in whatever format they want, \par
> your minimum responsibility is to review the number of the responses from \par
> the second link that are assigned to you as set forth below (the number of \par
> the response is identified at the top of the record by ##<actual number of \par
> response>###########################): \par
> \par
> Sarah Deutsch #1-8 \par
> Neil Duncan Dundas #9-16 \par
> Jeff Neuman #17-24 \par
> J. Scott Evans #25-32 \par
> Antonio Harris #33-40 \par
> Michael Froomkin #41-48 \par
> Michael Palage #49-56 \par
> Katrina Burchell #57-65 \par
> M. Scott Donahey #66-73 \par
> F. Peter Phillips NONE \par
> Ethan Katsh #74-81 \par
> Dr. Joelle Thibault NONE \par
> James A. Carmody #82-89 \par
> Tim Cole #90-98 \par
> John Berryhill #99-107 \par
> Maxim Waldbaum #108-115 \par
> Erik Wilbers NONE \par
> Dan Steinberg #116-123 \par
> Joon Hyung Hong #124-131 \par
> Graeme Dinwoodie #132-140 \par
> Erick Iriarte Ahon #141-148 \par
> Ramesh Kumar Nadarajah #149-155 \par
> I would like everyone to review their responses and provide a summary of \par
> their findings within two weeks if possible, which would put us at Feb \par
> 28th. \par
> Please advise Milton or I if you believe you cannot meet this deadline so \par
> we \par
> can either reassign or take on some ourselves. \par
\par
}
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|