RE: [nc-udrp] FW: UDRP Chair Position

["Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>]

You are correct J. Scott.  I can forward the Task Force's feelings to the NC
to the extent we feel it could make a difference.

-----Original Message-----
From: J. Scott Evans [mailto:jse@adamspat.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:49 AM
To: Neuman, Jeff; nc-udrp@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [nc-udrp] FW: UDRP Chair Position


I see no reason that the TF couldn't discuss it; however, it appears to be a
NC decision.

jse
----- Original Message -----
From: Neuman, Jeff <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us>
To: <nc-udrp@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:30 AM
Subject: [nc-udrp] FW: UDRP Chair Position


>
> All,
>
> This was received by the NC yesterday.  Is this something the TF should be
> discussing rather than just the Names Council.
>
> [council] UDRP Review Task Force Chairs
> * To: "'council@dnso.org <mailto:council@dnso.org>'" <council@dnso.org
> <mailto:council@dnso.org>>
> * Subject: [council] UDRP Review Task Force Chairs
> * From: "Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com
> <mailto:CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>>
> * Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:59:38 -0600
> * Sender: owner-council@dnso.org <mailto:owner-council@dnso.org>
>
> As you may not be aware, Milton and I will be leaving the NC after the
> February call. (I will give you a minute to wipe the tears from your eyes
> (heehee)).  We are the co-chairs for the UDRP Review and according to the
NC
> rules, only NC members can be chairs.  The UDRP Review Task Force will not
> be done with its work prior to Milton and I having to leave.  We thus have
> the following options as far as I can see:
>
> (1) We can make an exception to our rules that would allow us to continue
on
> until our work is completed (we would only stay on for the review and
> evaluation and not the implementation phase),
>
> (2) Milton and I can have one of our successors take our spot, or
>
> (3) The NC could elect new chairs.
>
> This issue will need to be dealt with by or before the next call.  If
there
> are other options you can think of, please let us know.  If not, I suggest
> people email the list with their preferences so we can see if we can
handle
> this offline so we are ready for any sort of voting we may need at the Feb
> call.
>
>
>
>