ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-udrp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-udrp] Re: [council] Re: UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC


In what format will the replies be published?

On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Oscar A. Robles-Garay wrote:

> How many responses are you expecting to have with this questionnaire ?
> tens? hundreds? thousands?
> 
> In case you are expecting something bigger than "tens" I would say to think 
> in the review process and change the initial format for specific 
> questions/answers, it is not easy to read thousands of pages of comments.
> 
> Oscar
> 
> 
> At 05:34 AM 11/6/2001, DNSO Secretariat wrote:
> >Secretariat proposal :
> >
> >May be the best thing to do is not to put anything on the Website, but to 
> >post the Questionnaire in a txt format to ga@dnso.org and to 
> >nc-udrp@dnso.org, with an automatic reply to nc-udrp@dnso.org so that 
> >people from the Task force can review the results.
> >Then the only thing people will have to do is to reply to the mail and to 
> >fill in the blanks.
> >Any comments ?
> >
> >         dnso.org webmaster.
> >
> >On 05 Nov, Chicoine, Caroline G. wrote :
> > > Please find below the UDRP Review Questionnaire for posting on the 
> > ICANN and
> > > DNSO's websites.  Once it has been posted by the Secretariat, I ask that
> > > each Council member provide your Constituency with the link, and that Danny
> > > provide the GA with a link (I do not have Danny's email handy and I cannot
> > > get out of this email to access it so I will resend with a copy to 
> > him).
> > >
> > > As you will note, there are several "Other" areas and areas in which we are
> > > requesting comments (rather than a "yes" or "no") and so I was unsure as to
> > > whether I needed to actually leave blanks or not.  Let me know if any 
> > format
> > > changes are required.  Also, how should the Task Force review the repsonse.
> > > Will they be posted to nc-udrp@dnso.org or will we need to monitor a 
> > certain
> > > list?  Please advise.
> > >
> > > Please email the list when it is posted so that are translators can then
> > > translate it into French and Spanish.  Once translated, could our
> > > translators please send the translated version to the Secretariat, for
> > > posting, and again I ask that once posted the Council members advise their
> > > Constituencies and Danny the GA.
> > >
> > > Finally, upon a review of the current draft of the Terms of Reference, I
> > > noticed that it needs to be updated.  Specifically, the "November 
> > 2-December
> > > 15" deadline for submitting questionnaire to public should be changed to
> > > "November 2-December 17"  given I am two days late in getting it posted.
> > > Likewise, please change the "November 1-January 15" deadline to November
> > > 1-January 17", and the January 16-February 1" deadline to January
> > > 17-February 13".  The February 14 deadline stays the same, but the entry
> > > should read "Names Council votes on Report at its February 14th
> > > teleconference"
> > >
> > > If you have any questions, please let me know.
> > >
> > > Thanks to all of those who participated in developing the questionnaire.
> > > Please remember that our work has only just begun.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  <<UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC>>
> 
> Top Level Domain .MX
> Tel +52 (8)3875346
> http://www.nic.mx
> 
> El contenido del presente mensaje de datos es confidencial. El Emisor no es 
> apoderado de NIC-Mexico ni tiene facultad alguna para obligar a NIC-Mexico 
> con la transmision y contenido del presente mensaje de datos, incluyendo el 
> (los) archivo(s) anexo(s).
> 

-- 
		Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                 -->It's very hot and humid here.<--



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>