ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-transfer]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-transfer] Impact to Registries


Jeff - I will be working on the root document this evening when I get home.
I expect that Glen will add this to the online version sometime tomorrow our
time.

All - I will be taking this opportunity to change a few typo's and
formatting problems, if you have any that you would like to add, please drop
me a note offline. Please note that I will be limiting these changes to
presentation and typography and *not* editorial and that these changes will
be clearly marked for the benefit of the reader.

Thanks in advance,


                       -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us>
To: <nc-transfer@dnso.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 11:07 PM
Subject: [nc-transfer] Impact to Registries


> Apologies for the late submission.
>
> IMPACT TO GTLD REGISTRIES
>
> This report contemplates several new and/or modified obligations that will
> impact gTLD Registries and, as is the case with the gTLD Registrars, it
will
> be important to ensure that ICANN and the DNSO are prepared to undertake
> outreach and education to ensure that all Registries and Registrars are
> aware of and compliant with these new and modified obligations.
>
> Perhaps the recommendation with the most impact on the gTLD Registries is
> the possibility that they serve as a dispute resolution provider in cases
> where Registrars either dispute a transfer or alternatively, the NACK of a
> transfer by the losing Registrar.  This may require gTLD Registries to
> supply new resources, including customer support and staff, that it does
not
> currently provide.  In addition, it may require gTLD Registries to engage
in
> limited fact-finding investigations in an attempt to enforce the
> recommendations set forth in this report.  Undoubtedly this may end up
> adding additional costs to the gTLD Registries which will be recoverable
> under the existing gTLD Registry Agreements with ICANN.
>
> The Task Force does not believe the costs incurred as a result of these
> modifications will be substantial in light of the report's efforts to
> standardize the transfer process, thereby creating increased certainty for
> end users, and ultimately portability of domain names.  During
> implementation discussions, further identification of cost areas can be
> undertaken by a joint working group of ICANN staff, Registrars, Registries
> and as needed, outside technical experts.
>
>
>
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
> Director, Law & Policy
> NeuStar, Inc.
> Loudoun Tech Center
> 46000 Center Oak Plaza
> Building X
> Sterling, VA 20166
> p: (571) 434-5772
> f:  (571) 434-5735
> e-mail: Jeff.Neuman@Neustar.us <mailto:Jeff.Neuman@Neustar.us>
>
> PLEASE NOTE THE CHANGE OF ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER AS WE HAVE MOVED
FROM
> OUR WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE.  THANKS.
>
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
> personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This
message
> may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is
> privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
> intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the
intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this e-mail
> message and any attachments hereto in error and that any review,
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify
> us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
>
>
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>