<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [nc-transfer] WLS proposal
Marilyn, I am one of the NCC reps on the TF. Are you asking if my proposal
has the endorsement of the NCC? Jamie
Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
> Jamie, thanks for your posting. On behalf of the Non commercial constituency, do you also have comments on the WLS?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Love [mailto:james.love@cptech.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 3:22 PM
> To: Transfer TF (E-mail)
> Cc: NCDNHC-discuss list
> Subject: [nc-transfer] WLS proposal
>
>
> As one of the members of the Transfers TK from the NCC, this is my proposed
> solution to the problem of expired domains.
>
> Rather than allocate these domains on a first come first serve basis, which
> creates a lot of problems in terms of how people get first in line, and
> which also presents problems for people that did not intend to let a domain
> lapse, I propose the following proceedure.
>
> 1. Whenever a domain expires, and after whatever grace period is
> appropriate, it be placed upon a list of expired domains, maintained joinly
> by the registrars who want to participate, with equal access to the list.
>
> 2. Over a period of 30 days, any person who wants to register the expired
> domain can express an interest.
>
> 3. During the 30 day period, the original domain owner can reactivate the
> domain.
>
> 4. If the original domain owner has not reactivated the domain during the
> 30 day period, the domain is assigned by lottery to one of the parties
> seeking the domain.
>
> Jamie
>
>
> ------
> James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
> http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
> voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
>
>
>
>
>
--
------
James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|