ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-transfer]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[nc-transfer] [fwd] Re: [ga] deletion policy - what should it look like? (from: k@widgital.com)


While this one was not mentioned in the conference calls, a  
requirement for such an acknowledgement, coupled with an appropriate 
deadline, would of course be another approach to handling  
inadvertent deletions.  It's somewhat similar to Elisabeth's 
suggestion.

-- 
Thomas Roessler                          http://log.does-not-exist.org/



----- Forwarded message from Kristy McKee <k@widgital.com> -----

From: k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)
To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
Cc: ga@dnso.org
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 13:12:46 -0500
Subject: Re: [ga] deletion policy - what should it look like?



>- Delete between M and N days after date of expiry.  (N - M = 7)


Thomas, the above in conjunction with an ACK from the TC or AC that the 
deletion is indeed intentional.

:)

~k

----- End forwarded message -----


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>